The Basic tenets of David Easton’s general system theory.

2. Explain the basic tenets of David Easton’s general system theory.

The basic unit of Easton’s system analysis is ‘interaction’. Interaction is generated from the behaviour of the members of the system once they play their role intrinsically . When these myriad interactions, within the perception of the scholar, become a ‘set of interrelations’, they're considered as a ‘system’. Easton’s material of study is merely the set of political interactions.
There are four major premises or broader concepts of his flow-model or input-output analysis:
  • (i) System;
  • (ii) Environment;
  • (iii) Response; and
  • (iv) Feedback.


His system may be a ‘political system’, the essential unit of study . it's a ‘system of interactions in any society through which binding or authoritative alloca­tions are made and implemented.’ Easton is curious about studying political life which is seen as a system of behaviour operating within and responding to its social environment while making binding allocations of values. The making of binding and authoritative decisions distinguishes the form of government from other systems (existing both within and out of doors the general society) that form the environment of that form of government .
Within this form of government , there are many political groups and organisations, called para-political systems. But he's more concerned with ‘political system’ standing because the most inclusive unit of political life. form of government , as such, is found everywhere. it's the inclusive whole of all political interactions. Easton analyses the character , conditions, and life processes of political life operating in sort of an analytic system.

mps 004, mps 004 comaparative politics, mps 004 solved assignment

By adopting the concept of ‘system’, Easton has free politics from its traditional, legalistic, institutional, and formal moorings, and proposes to look at it because it really is. This ‘system’ is formed of interactions of these persons who participate publicly life, and are related with making and implementing of public policies.

Easton isn't satisfied to ascertain ‘political activity’ merely as ‘direction of man by man’ (de Jouvenel), or as ‘relating to regulate or will’ (Catlin), or ‘relation between influencer and therefore the influenced’ (Lasswell). it's also not capable see politics associated with authority, power, government and rule (Dahl). His concept of system is more inclusive.

In a sense, his concept of ‘system’ is integrative involving values, culture, authority, governance, implementation, participation, process, etc. ‘System’ may be a very wide term, which incorporates all sorts of formal and informal processes, interactions, functions, structures, values, behaviour, etc. The form of government allocates values for the entire society and its decisions stand obligatory. A ‘system’, thus, are often any set of variables, whatever be the shape or intensity of interactions or interrelationship operating among them. A form of government may be a subsystem of the societal system, but it's a binding power of its own. Even within a form of government , there are many subsystems.


Easton’s form of government may be a complex set of certain processes or interactions which transforms particular inputs into outputs of authoritative policies, decisions, and implementation. This conversion takes place in some environment. As an open system, it must have the resilience to reply thereto environment, facing all obstacles, and adjusting itself to conditions.
Analytically, environment are often of two types:

(i) Extra-societal, and
(ii) Intra-societal.

As given within the Diagram above extra-societal environment involves interna­tional political systems, like various political systems, alliances, UNO, etc.; international ecological systems; and, international social systems, as cultural, socio-structural, economic, demographic, and other systems. Intra-societal systems include ecological, biological, personality-oriented, social, cultural, socio-structural, and demographic systems operating within the form of government .

Conflicts, strains, and changes emerging out of environment can prove functional or dysfunctional thereto form of government . Therefore, the latter should have, for its survival, persistent capability to reply thereto environment. Easton rightly puts more emphasis on the capacity of the system to deal with the environment. Countries of the Third World can find tons of useful material in Easton’s concept of ‘environment’, and required ‘capacity’ to affect it.


A form of government has got to answer its environment in dealing with crises, stresses, and other difficulties. it's also to perform, on its own, another functions, such as, maintaining order within the society and to uphold its own form and identity amid ever-changing environment. All of them are anesthetize the generic concept of ‘response’.


‘Feedback’ is another important concept in Easton’s systems theory. Capacity of a form of government to persist over time depends on feedback. it's a dynamic process through which information about the outputs and therefore the environment is communicated to the system which can end in subsequent change or modification of the system. Information about demands and supports may enter the system as inputs in usual manner.

When infor­mation concerning converted inputs, or outputs comes in, then there's a sort of re-communication of data , or re-inputation of inputs already converted into outputs. By doing so, the form of government gets a chance to switch or transform its behaviour conducive thereto feedback. during this manner, it can make it simpler or continue a far better way. within the absence of feedback, it's likely to work within the usual unresponsive manner, and lose support.

Information about environment reaching as inputs in usual manner may enter the system too late. it's going to reach there during a distorted form, because it happened with Gandhi Government (1977) and therefore the Shah of Iran (1979)- ‘Loop’ means a curve that rejoins the most line farther on. ‘Feedback Loop’ connotes a process wherein information is obtained; actions, reactions or responses are made on it; then to ascertain the result, and re-collect the same; and, to be benefited by it to realize the goal.
It includes the arrangement and linking of data channels for the aforesaid purpose. Feedback involves a continuity by linking of obtaining information, reacting, and knowing the consequences further to enhance upon Systems behaviour and responses. it's a ‘output-information-reinputation- recommunication-reoutputation’ process.

Feedback process, during this way, cares with input sequence, demands and support emerging out of environment, conversion processes, outputs, and feedback mechanisms. Feedback mechanisms carry effects and consequences of the outputs into the system again as inputs. they create the system dynamic, purposive, and goal-oriented. Interactions and their various forms within a system confront the issues of stress, maintenance, etc., by counter-balancing, by reducing, or by removal. But their interac­tion-circuits may remain incomplete or breakdown at any point, e.g., stoppage at the extent of demands. a requirement has got to go along side the long conversion process.
Easton presents the concept of ‘feedback loop’ because the basis of the capacity of the outputs to get specific support. It connects the conse­quences of the outputs with the inflow of inputs: demands and supports. Thus, it establishes a circulatory relationship between inputs and outputs. there's all-round impact of this dynamic process – on support, stress, survival and persistence. It completes the political circuit through its input – conversion – output – feedback process. during a form of government , several feedback processes operate at various levels. But Easton relates the feedback processes concerning the entire form of government .

The feedback circuit are often analysed from several angles. From the view of system-maintenance or gaining specific support, its operation are often divided into four stages:

(1) There are situations of feedback, which may begin of authorised direction, associate outputs, or outcomes. all of them are a part of the form of government . But its estimation depends on its perception or observation.

(2) There are feedback-responses which may be within the sort of satisfying the stress , or positive or negative support.

(3) within the third stage feedback-responses are communicated to the political authorities.

(4) within the last stage, after completion of the feedback-circuit the authorities deliberate, discuss, and reach certain decisions. Much depends on variables like responsiveness of authorities, time-lag, availability of infor­mation-resources for decision-making, etc. Here, resources of the system as an entire are involved. The feedback circuit , in Easton’s input-output analysis, interlinks authorities and its members during a manner that the previous may take steps soon after they get information through the feedback.

For Assignment PDF
Subcribe YouTube : My IGNOU Solutions